Dedicated to Public Education about EVP and ITC and the Support of EVP/ITC Experimenters Everywhere
 

Articles > Research Articles

4Cell EVP Demonstration

by Tom and Lisa Butler
(Based on a Summer 2005 AA-EVP NewsJournal article)

 

 

The AA-EVP has been looking for an effective way to use EVP as a research tool for studying etheric to physical influences. Part of the problem is finding a way to make the recording of the phenomenal voices more reliable. There has also been a problem with experimenter ability, which varies considerably amongst people willing to participate in experiments. The Association is a teaching/learning organization and our preference is for people to focus on personal growth, rather than to enter into organized activity that might cause undue demands on performance. This is not a competition.

One initiative to increase our understanding that has proven to be very effective is the 4Cell EVP Demonstration, which is being conducted by AA-EVP members and tracked in the Idea Exchange. The 4Cell project is designed to function as a testbed in which new ideas can be tried and the limits of EVP can be explored. As 4Cell matures with more cells and more experiments on record, we anticipate being able to provide solid scientific evidence of the existence of EVP, and the fact that EVP is proof of personal survival. Further, we expect this proof to be in a form that the scientific community will be able to accept, and therefore, feel obliged to repeat the experiments.

The 4Cell EVP Demonstration protocol is is explained here. We are available to assist researchers in setting up Cells to meet their research goals.

Each cell consists of four people:

1. A Requester who thinks of a request to be given to cooperating etheric communicators. A request may be a question, such as, "Who was my favorite teacher," or a request for action, such as, "Please tell the Receiver what I am wearing now." The request should be specifically of interest to the Requester. The request can be directed at a research question, such as, "What happens after the moment of physical death?" The Requester tells the Sender the request but not the answer or expected response.

2. A Sender who is given the request and then conveys it to his or her etheric communicators, asking that they send the requested information to the Receiver. This may be accomplished in any way the Sender feels will work. Part of the objective here is to allow the participant to invent a way that "seems" right. Since so much of this is intuitive, personal initiative may be more effective than constraining rules. If there is doubt as to how to proceed, we advise that the Sender meditates or contemplates the question. The idea is to send the message psychically, but to also send it verbally and maybe even in writing. All are effective techniques for EVP. The Sender then notifies the Receiver that a request has been "sent."

3. A Receiver who conducts an EVP session asking to record the response to the request. Since the energy required for trans-etheric communication is limited, the Receiver should be the only one conducting an EVP session for any particular cycle, and should only know that a request has been made. If the Receiver finds EVP in the resulting recording, the messages are sent to the Scribe.

4. A Scribe who accepts the EVP, if any, from the Receiver and makes a first determination as to what is said in the utterance, if possible. The Scribe then asks the Questioner for the request and posts the two on a private email sharing group so that the other three members of the Cell are able to listen to the EVP and determine which might be a fit for the request. The results of this collaboration, along with a standardized report of the proceedings, is then posted on the Idea Exchange for peer review.

5. Other members of the AA-EVP are then asked to consider the offered EVP, if any, by functioning as a listening panel.

Cell members have been asked to rotate positions, but we are finding that it is more important that the cell have some degree of recording success than it is to rotate positions, so we are now asking that each Cell has at least one experienced experimenter with some level of confidence that at least some utterance will be recorded. The Cells were also asked to record on a regular, weekly basis, but now we see that there are too many normal living interruptions, and it is better that the group try to record when possible, perhaps on a monthly schedule.

Since Cell members are usually scattered around the country, it is impossible to physically supervise the experimental cycles, so many experiments by many different Cells over may months should provide dependable "proof" of the concept, even though individual results should be judged on a case by case basis.

In the event that one of the four members is temporarily not able to participate, the function of Receiver and Scribe can be combined. But separation between the Questioner and the Sender is required to address the possibility that the Questioner is asking something that is emotionally charged. This also separates the expected response from the send/receive process. The reason we are asking the Scribe to independently decide whether or not the request has been correctly responded to is to see if he or she is able to arrive at that conclusion without "group think" unconsciously guided by the Questioner.

The protocol does not require a specific type of question or method for obtaining the EVP, except for the controls of who knows what, when, who attempts to record the EVP and who makes the first interpretation of the results. The reason for this is that the group dynamics are as much an interest to us as are the resulting EVP. One of the predictions is that a cooperating group will have better results than one that experiences internal conflict. The concept is that the rapport of mutual cooperation builds the kind of etheric/physical energy necessary for etheric to physical influences. Another term for this is "Contact Field."

We did not know how well the Cells would do when we began the project. The first two Cell reports made it clear that the communicating entities were happy to participate and that they could do all that we asked. Let us first give you a summary of the results received by the Cells as of July 2005 and then we will discuss the implications of those results and what we see for the future.

4Cell 1 – Voices: Andrea Carr, Siobhan McBride, Karen Mossey and Sue Mousseau (James Jones replaced Sue in experiment four and then the group dissolved):

  • Experiment 1 question: “Does it take more of your energy to manifest a Class A EVP, and if so, please indicate your answer as ‘More energy’ or ‘No difference.’” Class B answer: “No difference.”

  • Experiment 2 question: “From what level in the Afterlife are you communicating with us?” Class B answer: “Level six.”

  • Experiment 3 question: “What can we, as receivers on the physical level, do to help facilitate communication from you, the transmitters in the spiritual?” Class B+ answer: “Just open up the portal.”

  • Experiment 4 question: “What is the purpose of our communication with the other side? What is it we're supposed to be doing in order to help them?” There was no appropriate response recorded.

  • Experiment 5 question: “Can anyone (any dead former human being) on the other side be involved in EVP messaging to us?” Class C answer: Four distinct utterances in same file, the second being “Perhaps.”

  • Experiment 6 question: “Is there a reason that some spirits do not come through for us? Why would that be?” Class B answer: “Stop moving” and “That’s right.” Class B- answer: “Yes … people.”

4Cell 2 –Infinite: Mary Jo Gran, Rheta Conley, Shelly Morrison and Vicki Talbott:

  • Experiment 1 question: “Can you tell me the name of Jim Robinson’s make believe sister?” Correct answer: “Sissy Sally.” Class B answer: “Sally’s the name.” (Other appropriate answers were also recorded.)

  • Experiment 2 question: “Who is the artist and what is the name of the painting hanging at the end of the entrance hallway in Vicki and Pete’s home?” Correct Answer: “Marc Chagall” and “The Lovers.” Class B answer: “Who painted it? … Chagall did.”

  • Experiment 3 question: “What Did Keith’s Grandpa Hallmark give him, and also, it has been lost can they tell us where it is?” Correct Answer: “Cue stick.” Class C answer: “A cue” and “Christy know right where it is.

  • Experiment 4 question: “What are the names of Jim’s Montessori School Teachers?” Correct Answer: “Vivian” and “Rosmund.” Class B answer: “Vivian.” Class C answer in same file: Rosmund.”

  • Experiment 5 question: “What is the most common sign that those in Spirit do to let us know you are near us or that you have been around?” Class C answer: Not clear.

  • Experiment 6 question: “What was the name of the tavern where I (Vicki) met my husband?” Correct answer: “The Waterfront.” Class B answer: “Has a view of the bay.”

  • Experiment 7 question: “I would like to hear from my deceased pet, “Toby. … I am hoping that there will be some barking on the tape. A Class B- EVP saying, “Tob … y” was recorded, as well as a very convincing Class A dog bark.

4Cell 3 –White Noise: Michael Hester, Cheryl Hoes, Bill and Hedi Ambruster and Eric Cole:

  • Experiment 1 question: “What is my mother-in-law’s maiden name?” The correct answer, Downing” was recorded but the relevance of the response was not realized until well after the report was submitted, and subsequently, the EVP was discarded.

  • Experiment 2 question: “What is the sex of Cheryl Jones’ baby?” There were no EVP recorded.

4Cell 4 –Delta: Erland Babcock, Bryan Kaplan, Richard Shenk and Harry Flagle:

  • Experiment 1 question: “Assuming there is no time in your world and that you have vibratory frequency…How can you have a frequency without reference to time?” Class B answer: “Be technical.” (We could not make out the additional utterances.)

  • Experiment 2 question: “How would you describe your world?” Class C+ answer: “Take good care of you.”

  • Experiment 3 question: “How do you affect the objects in my world?” Class C answer: “It’s hard to see your message.”

A successful experiment is one in which an EVP has been recorded that either specifically answers the question or responds in a way that an answer can be reasonably construed from the EVP. For instance, in Cell Voices experiment 2, “Level six” Even though we do not know if that is a correct answer, it is appropriate.

Of the eighteen experiments conducted thus far, eleven or 61% have been successful. The etheric communicators have had a very large number of possible answers from which to choose. For instance, in Cell Infinity’s experiment 4, asking for Jim's Montessori School Teachers, the expected answer was given as “Vivian” and Rosmund” How many first names are there in the western culture? There must be thousands. The odds of a person guessing the correct name must be about the same as winning the California Lottery. What are the odds of selecting the right name twice in the same EVP?

Guessing eleven appropriate answers out of eighteen attempts must be similar in difficulty to winning the California Lottery eleven out of eighteen tries. The results of the experiments would be astounding just because of how much the answers have exceeded what would be expected for guessing. Since we know that the communicators are intelligent, aware people, the gratifying part is not beating the odds, but how cooperative they have been.

We wish to thank all of the Cell members for their continued participation in the experiment. We especially thank Shelly Morrison and Vicki Talbott for moderating the Idea Exchange forum and for helping everyone get through the complicated protocol. And yes, a hearty thanks to their etheric partners who have been so willing to help us learn.

A powerful research tool

The 4Cell EVP Demonstration protocol has demonstrated that the etheric communicators are very interested in assisting us in our research. In fact, it seemed clear that some of the Cells improved each cycle, as Cell members on both sides of the veil became more adept at communication. We are convinced that any researcher can easily form one or more experimental Cells to conduct experiments to study the nature of reality and/or to discover information, such as the location of missing people.

If you are such a researcher, please contact the AA-EVP and we will attempt to assist you any way we are able.

 

 

News/Updates   |   Articles  |   Membership   |   Members' Area   |   Big Circle

About AA-EVP   |   FAQ   |   Examples   |   Techniques   |   Resources   |   Links   |   Etheric Studies  |   Research

Donate to the AA-EVP   |   Disclaimer

Creative Commons LicenseUnless otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License

Contact the AA-EVP